Page 1 of 2
Avatar
Posted:
Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:39 pmby que13x
So I got this flick on Blu-Ray and I think it looks amazing!
Anyhow what I really want to know is what people think about an RTS game based on the movie.
I was thinking about making 3D models for some RTS engine and having the two sides go at it in usual fashion.
Thoughts?
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:34 pmby crait
The two sides would be pretty uneven.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:51 amby que13x
Kind of like the US and Russia during the cold war or the Rebels and the Empire in Star Wars. One side had the tech but few units. The other side did not have as much tech but had overwhelming numbers.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:36 amby ace
Meh, I didn't like the movie :p Hurt locker was much better.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:00 amby que13x
Gosh but Hurt Locker is a totally different kind of film! It isn't even science fiction.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:49 pmby crait
Que, I guess that makes a lot of sense but it seems to me that there are a lot more perks of the military versus the Na'vi. Sure, they had the animals on their side but are you visioning the game to be like that, too? And what if the fight wasn't on Pandora and instead on Earth? Doesn't seem like the Na'vi would have any chance.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:58 pmby ace
que13x wrote:Gosh but Hurt Locker is a totally different kind of film! It isn't even science fiction.
It's still wayy better
They were in the same category for an oscar so therefore I retain the right to compare them!
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:31 pmby que13x
Those stupid people at the awards wouldn't know a good movie if Shakespeare himself rose from the grave and handed them a script!
Aliens was a good show in my opinion and according to IMDB Avatar scored about the same in user ratings.
At least MY comparison relates to sci fi films featuring invading humans and a native alien race!
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:13 pmby crait
Shakespear was a horrible writer for his time and still is.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:08 pmby que13x
Many would disagree with you.
All I can say is that his legacy still lives on after 400 or so years and who will remember the crait 400 years from now?
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:21 pmby ace
Ouch.
I'm tired of shakespeare, trying to read his writings about his homosexual desires just piss me off >.>
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:38 pmby que13x
ace wrote:I'm tired of shakespeare, trying to read his writings about his homosexual desires just piss me off >.>
OH and look, he's still relevant for the times too!
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:30 pmby crait
Actually, yes, they will remember me in 400 years from now. I'm ambitious. I don't think I personally know anyone who likes Shakespear besides one or two teachers. Everyone else either hates him and his work or has no opinion of him.
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:55 amby The Cookie Monster
Charles Dickens and Roald Dahl FTW..
ok, let us get back on topic...
avatar sucked, and i think it took about 15 years for the making... for that much time it is worse then the new cats and dogs....
Re: Avatar
Posted:
Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:49 amby ace
crait wrote:Actually, yes, they will remember me in 400 years from now. I'm ambitious. I don't think I personally know anyone who likes Shakespear besides one or two teachers. Everyone else either hates him and his work or has no opinion of him.
Admittance is the first step to overcoming denial